<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scaling-Laws on 111qqz's blog</title><link>https://111qqz.com/en/tags/scaling-laws/</link><description>Recent content in Scaling-Laws on 111qqz's blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>hust.111qqz@gmail.com (111qqz)</managingEditor><webMaster>hust.111qqz@gmail.com (111qqz)</webMaster><copyright>© 2011-2026 111qqz</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://111qqz.com/en/tags/scaling-laws/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Scaling Laws：为什么可以用小模型预测大模型？Chinchilla 又改变了什么？</title><link>https://111qqz.com/en/post/%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0/2026-10-19-llm-scaling-laws-chinchilla/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 21:30:00 +0800</pubDate><author>hust.111qqz@gmail.com (111qqz)</author><guid>https://111qqz.com/en/post/%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0/2026-10-19-llm-scaling-laws-chinchilla/</guid><description>&lt;h2 class="relative group"&gt;起因
 &lt;div id="起因" class="anchor"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
 
 &lt;span
 class="absolute top-0 w-6 transition-opacity opacity-0 -start-6 not-prose group-hover:opacity-100 select-none"&gt;
 &lt;a class="text-primary-300 dark:text-neutral-700 !no-underline" href="#%e8%b5%b7%e5%9b%a0" aria-label="Anchor"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://111qqz.com/en/post/%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0/2026-10-19-pretraining-to-post-training/" &gt;上一篇&lt;/a&gt;理清了 Pre-training 和 Post-training 的关系——Pre-training 让模型学会语言建模，SFT 和 RLHF 再让它学会遵循指令。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;写完那篇之后，我回过头来想一个更上游的问题：Pre-training 本身应该怎么做？具体来说，假设手里有一笔固定的训练预算（比如一定数量的 GPU 时间），我应该训一个多大的模型、喂多少数据？&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>